Sex exclusive of confidence and familiarity not including sex - sexuality

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-

Excerpt From The Bond Handbook: How to Absorb and Build up Every Association in Your Life by Kevin B. Burk

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-

We no longer feel the communal anxiety to confine sex to committed relationships. In fact, we're free to explore our sexuality with just about any person we like. Sex is now an accepted recreational activity. What we often don't realize, however, is that even casual, recreational sex still involves intimacy. We may have overcome our fear and shame about sex, but many of us still have issues a propos intimacy. If we encounter more relationship than we can handle, we will feel threatened; our security checklist will be triggered. No be of importance how "safe" we make sex, sex may not be safe to us.

When we be subjected to an orgasm, we bare ourselves more completely and more honestly than at any other time. We let our egos die for a moment, and we have the ability to experience a true association with a further person. Then the ego comes back into the picture, and we're hit with the fear of separation, and all of our old patterns. If we don't have enough trust or a sufficient amount safety, we will feel threatened, guilty, and in general unsafe. No be of importance how much society's beliefs about sex have evolved in our lifetime, our core conditioning tells us that there's no such thing as no-strings sex. We still equate sex with love, and love with commitment. And we equate love and assurance with vulnerability, responsibility, and the fear that our needs will not be met.

Sex is very easy to come by in today's society. What most of

us crave, however, is not sex, but intimacy. The challenge is that the only model most of us have for expressing or experiencing familiarity is sex. Relationship requires trust, and trust takes time. It's very challenging to be subjected to true intimacy by means of casual sex.

The level of confidence we be subjected to because of sex can be threatening to many of us, chiefly if the sex occurs early in the relationship. Security is critical in the early stages of a relationship--even the minimum security violation can mark the end of a growing romance. As we get to know our partners over time, we conceive a foundation of trust and familiarity. We can keep minor shelter violations in perspective. This is not the case when we have truly casual sex with someone.

When we be converted into sexual with a character we've just met, even the smallest security violation will be an adequate amount to stop our being paid to know each other. One of the challenges is that it's not usually fitting or likely to have a Association Definition Talk with a being we've known less than six hours. There is no real connection to discuss. While we both may have sought after to pursue a romantic bond before we had sex, we often find we're less concerned the next morning, for the reason that we feel unsafe. We practiced too much familiarity too quickly, and we need to construct some distance, some space, and to put up some walls so that we can recover. These walls, however, block the emotional and spiritual associations we skilled that made us want to get to know each other in the first place. Since we don't really know our partner, we astonishment if there was ever a genuine correlation concerning us. We often end up with the awkward "morning after" where one of us promises to call the other, and neither of us believes the phone will in point of fact ring.

Two common small screen shows determine our existing approaches to sex not including closeness and confidence lacking sex.

SEX Exclusive of INTIMACY: "SEX AND THE CITY"

HBO's tube series, "Sex and the City," follows the loves and lives of four distinct women breathing in New York City. The show has develop into a cultural hallmark for the reason that it explores sexuality from the woman's point of view in frank, funny, and direct ways. The four main typeset are smart, independent, decent, professional, appealing women. They each have a another advance to sex, love and relationships, and concerning them they cover a broad spectrum of expectations and attitudes towards sex. The main characters have befit so much a part of common civilization that many women use them as character reference points to express their own patterns and feelings about sex. So do many gay men.

For those of you not customary with the run (and even for those of us who are), I'll endow with a brief depiction of each of the main lettering to illustrate their attitudes

towards sex.

SAMANTHA

Samantha Jones takes the most stereotypically male accost to sex. She truly enjoys sex, and for the most part, she's content to have a good for your health sex life with many partners. She has no guilt or shame linked with sex. Sex for Samantha does not call for any kind of emotional commitment, nor does it imply any kind of relationship. She enjoys sex for the sake of sex. Samantha is by and large self-sufficient, and is able to meet her legalization needs because of her close friendships. Though Samantha had three considerable romantic relationships for the duration of the run of the show (including a lesbian relationship), she has never set out to find a relationship.

CARRIE

Carrie Bradshaw has a good for your health appreciation for casual sex as well. Carrie, however, is looking for amazing more than just sex--she is looking for a relationship. While Carrie is less liable than Samantha to cleanly hook up with an attractive stranger, she doesn't need to feel like she's in a committed affiliation already she will have sex. Sex is a part of casual dating for Carrie.

MIRANDA

Miranda Hobbes is more attracted in discovery a romantic relationship than she admits. For Miranda, sex is more than just sex--it implies some kind of commitment, and requires some kind of emotional connection. The few times Miranda has indulged in austerely casual sex, she's been disappointed. Miranda needs to feel that sex is a part of a relationship--and she has, in the past, used sex as a way to try to initiate a relationship. Once she has sex with someone, she directly begins to see him as a aptitude long-term romantic partner.

CHARLOTTE

If Samantha is the most stereotypically mannish in her approach to sex, Charlotte York is the most stereotypically feminine. While she doesn't like to admit it, Charlotte is uncomfortable with the idea of casual sex. For Charlotte, sex be supposed to only be part of a committed relationship. Charlotte sets the most boundaries with abide by to her sex life--how far she's eager to go sexually has a aim relation to how beefy a dedication she receives from her partner. Of avenue this did boomerang on her--she made her first partner wait until they were married ahead of she would have sex with him, and then open that he couldn't.

INTIMACY Lacking SEX: "WILL & GRACE"

"Sex and the City" above all focuses on sex. If we want to find a model for an intimate relationship, we have to look to another accepted tube show: "Will & Grace. " Will Truman and Grace Adler share a tremendous quantity of love, trust and intimacy in their relationship. They bear out and assistance each other, and they share the kind of emotional acquaintances that most of us truly crave in our lives. Ironically, the only aim that they administer to do this is that sex can never be a part of their relationship, since Will is gay. Women and gay men have continually joint a distinctive bond. In many ways, relationships concerning women and gay men are the only ones where we can come across true relationship lacking concerning sex.

But sex and closeness are still connected. The more intimate we befit with someone, the more crucial it will be that we are able to convey that closeness all through sex. Our objective in our romantic relationships is to feel loved. Ultimately, love involves a assess of sex and intimacy. But for many of us, the alternative seems to be both having intimacy exclusive of sex, or sex not including intimacy. We've all but forgotten how to bloc the two.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-

Kevin B. Burk is the biographer of The Association Handbook: How to Absorb and Build up Every Association in Your Life. Visit http://www. everyrelationship. com for a FREE report on creating AMAZING Relationships.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-